The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 19:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

S. Ramachandran (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article fails WP:NPOL. The article was proposed for deletion few days ago, but the author removed it without addressing the concerns or demonstrating how the article satisfies the requirements of WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Idoghor Melody (talk) 10:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and India. Idoghor Melody (talk) 10:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:43, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep:S. Ramachandran is a politician who is the secretary of the Tamil Nadu unit of CPIM which is one of the only six national parties of India [This can be soon become one of the only five national parties because BSP is on the verge of losing the status]. Besides the article has some reliable sources and secondary sources and hence it meets the general notability guideline and Wikipedia:Core content policies. XYZ 250706 (talk) 13:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Besides multiple Wikipedia articles having less citations or having no citations stay on Wikipedia. But it has already 3 reliable sources and secondary sources and more can be added. An improvement tag can be added but deletion is not right. XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please tag those articles, we need to review or remove them as well, that would be a help. Oaktree b (talk) 15:11, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Doesn't meet political notability, works in the party as a functionary. Sourcing is not helpful, nor can I find anything showing notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:12, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per nom fails WP:NPOL. Poor sources with no notable coverage on the subject. The subject does not seem to warrant a biographical page because of no significant, interesting, or unusual enough coverage to deserve attention or to be recorded. RangersRus (talk) 14:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not meet NPOL, and I'm unable to find evidence that he meets GNG. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:50, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.