The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rickey Harris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. All sources are trivial. A WP:BEFORE did not pull up anything that would pass GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Football, and Canada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:21, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 10:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the article does not pass GNG. We have finally realized that not every person who kicked a pall around on the court and got paid money to do so for a few days is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable subject, fails WP:GNG. --Angelo (talk) 21:12, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Clearly fails WP:GNG.Mahdiar86 (talk) 23:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.