The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:00, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revimedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been repeatedly deleted under WP:G11 and repeatedly recreated by page author. Suggest deletion and salting. Exemplo347 (talk) 09:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as corporate spam; no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:33, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as clear advertising alone with advertising sources. SwisterTwister talk 17:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.