The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:35, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rehal Dynasty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't source this. It's kings were evidently Rehal (king) and Rehal II. [Rehal (king)]] says "Due to lack of sources available, the king Rehal is regarded as one of the lost Kashmiri kings." Dougweller (talk) 15:11, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unverifiable. The book "Lost Kings by Ahnya Venkatesh" doesn't exist. I had a cursory look at the creator's other contributions - the user definitely needs to be warned for creating hoaxes. utcursch | talk 00:18, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Source cannot be verified and doesn't seem to exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orasis (talk • contribs) 05:52, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.