The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

QuietRock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertisement RemotelyInterested (talk) 14:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Engineering, and California. Skynxnex (talk) 14:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment:Haven't checked notability yet but the article's tone is definitely not so bad that it needs to be deleted for it. Mach61 (talk) 22:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG, sources are not significant in their coverage or are just product listings or routine PR sources. Searches find product listings as well. Promotional in tone and borderline WP:G11 v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 22:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Sounds promotional and fails CORP notability The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.