The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BigDom 16:46, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Provanhall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Incorrectly nominated for Speedy Deletion by User:Blairtummock for following reason:

"this is not an area of Glasgow but part of a district. It does not have a history or identity separate from the Easterhouse dirstict of which it is part. The page has been live for 3 years yet has no content"

Not a valid criterion, so posting this here for debate. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 11:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It has a Primary School, a Housing Association, press articles refer to people being from Provanhall, etc. There is also the 15th century Provanhall House itself, contemporaneous with the oldest house in Glasgow itself. While there may be an argument for a redirect to Easterhouse, a development of the historical angle could unbalance and then outgrow the Easterhouse article so better to retain as free-standing. AllyD (talk) 23:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. —AllyD (talk) 23:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per AllyD. It has an identity distinct from Easterhouse and there is the potential for expansion. --Deskford (talk) 00:32, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep again, as per AllyD. It's not quite true that in three years there's been no content added... there's an infobox that I added four months ago. It should be expanded though. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 07:44, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.