The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  11:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protests against Barack Obama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mainly unsourced and too broad a subject, how do you define a "protest" JMHamo (talk) 01:10, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. idk, how do you define a protest? as for too broad, that's clearly not the case with all the Trump protest articles. --Ethanbas (talk) 01:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This could be a useful topic if appropriately researched and cited. I have added some detail to make it a little more substantial, but I only grabbed the low-hanging fruit from a Google search. A couple of those previously included were not specifically against Barack Obama, though, so it could be more focused. Jack N. Stock (talk) 03:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but preferably move to Timeline of protests against Barack Obama for that most accurately describes the content of the article, if needed, we could suggest a split. Sources are a separate issue and there is no need for deletion. If a reliable source calls something a "protest", it would make sense to include it in this article. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:42, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and I like the idea proposed by Champion to move to Timeline of protests against Barack Obama. Protests against Obama did happen and anyone researching the subject of protests (esp in the wake of Timeline of protests against Donald Trump) should have a similar article for comparison. That aside, it passes GNG for being in the news over time. Needs expansion. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:15, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Timeline..." would make it harder to find. It's chronological, which seems reasonable for an historic topic, but it's also fairly new. A more general title of Protests against Barack Obama provides more room for development. Jack N. Stock (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • I agree with Jack N. Stock. I think the name shouldn't be changed, for now. Either name, glad to see a consensus for keeping the article. -Ethanbas (talk) 01:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • @Ethanbas, Jacknstock, and Megalibrarygirl: It would then make sense to open an RM after this discussion is done with, considering there is overwhelming consensus already to keep, but we're split on what it should be called. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Champion: President Trump has both, only fair President Obama gets both. Jack N. Stock (talk) 04:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
          • Well, so actually I created the Trump protest timeline on January 21, and one reason I created it (and why Wikipedians support it being kept) is because the main protest article got so big, so it's in order to clean the main protest article, in addition to providing another way of looking at the list of protests. Also, a timeline allows for smaller protests to be included. I think having both articles is reasonable if this article gets *really* long, but I don't think it will. Anyways, I also just highlighted a reason to not rename this article to "Timeline of ..."; namely, the Trump protests article existed before the Trump protests timeline article, which *I* made, and I don't think is appropriate for Obama, for now. -Ethanbas^talk 05:26, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
          • Anyhow, either name is fine with me, because I do acknowledge the arguments for renaming this to "Timeline of...". Ethanbas^talk 05:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
            • If it is changed to "Timeline of..." it will remain a chronological list. Leave it at the current name space and it has a chance to develop into an actual article. Nobody is going to develop themes in a timeline or creatively rearrange it. It will stunt the development. I think the current structure is a good way to start, but not a good place to finish. Jack N. Stock (talk) 05:54, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
              • After seeing the arguments by Ethanbas and Jacknstock, I think I understand where you're both going with this. The reason we have two Trump articles is because of the size. I think I like Jacknstock's suggestion that we wait and see if/when the article needs a separate timeline section. That way the article can develop beyond a list. I think that's a good argument for keeping the same name. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Needs to be fleshed out further and requires additional sourcing, but its a notable topic with appropriate references. Alansohn (talk) 22:24, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but move to Timeline of protests against Barack Obama, until there is a unifying theme (that passes notability guidelines) connecting the protests. --Enos733 (talk) 20:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep However it should be moved to "Timeline of protests against Barack Obama" for reasons stated by others. The Ninja5 Empire (Talk) 04:41, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Victor Grigas (talk) 02:56, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - protest is a valid form of civil discourse, and many of these protests were notable in and of themselves, thus a list is valid. I don't object to a move or merger. Bearian (talk) 14:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - but move to timeline of protests or list of protests. Existing articles (such as Tea Party protests and protests against the Libyan War) adequately cover the protests that occurred against Obama, but it would be good to have a list of all of the protests. Orser67 (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.