The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is very clear to keep. (non-admin closure) —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:08, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Mafalda of Bulgaria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am having trouble finding significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. As far as I can tell, the article does not meet either WP:SINGER or WP:BASIC notability criteria. Surtsicna (talk) 12:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 12:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 12:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 12:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 12:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 12:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete , no indication of notability. Smeat75 (talk) 16:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Devokewater @ 09:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep Subject is clearly notable. She is the subject of various articles from reliable sources including Paper Magazine, WWD, Town & Country, Yahoo, MBS News, and Tory Daily. Seems to me she's been significantly covered. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• That might just be sufficient! It seems the problem was that I searched for information about "Princess Mafalda of Bulgaria", whereas most of the sources cited above do not call her that. Surtsicna (talk) 23:11, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:30, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Willthacheerleader18 --Richiepip (talk) 00:32, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Willthacheerleader18, Richiepip, WP:SOGCOV, and User:Bearian/Standards#Notability_of_Consorts_of_nobility. She has a career, and has gotten coverage by herself in European press. Bearian (talk) 14:45, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as the singer has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources identified in this discussion that show a pass of WP:BASIC so that deletion is unnecessary, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 19:21, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the presented tabloid articles are not enough to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:48, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Per sourcing, per WP:SIGCOV, per overall coverage. None of the Delete !votes gives a reasoning based on guidelines.BabbaQ (talk) 19:28, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep agree with User: Atlantic306. Cape Diamond MM (talk) 06:38, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment not super impressed with the sources presented (also the link to Yahoo seems not to point to anything?) but certainly it's better than can be said for most of the not-actually-nobility that have been deleted recently. Should seriously consider renaming the article if it is kept. --JBL (talk) 17:18, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.