The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. asilvering (talk) 20:50, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Priestly Union Marcel Lefebvre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor schism of a schism, not notable. None of the sources actually appear to mention the Priestly Union. Anything worthwhile can be merged into Richard Williamson (bishop). — Moriwen (talk) 20:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — Moriwen (talk) 20:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and France. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per nom ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 21:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No evidence it passes GNG. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  PUML is a little schism, but is important to everyone to know about the divisions inside Traditionalist Catholicism. It should not to merge in the bishop Williamson's biography because he is not vinculated to PUML at present! 1977Brazilian (talk) 20:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Then cover it in an article on schismatic Catholics. No need for a standalone page. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - messy soap box of a coat rack. How many Monsignors can dance on the head of a pin? Bearian (talk) 06:25, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not independently notable. I am inclined to believe that this could be recreated as a plausible redirect to Richard Williamson (bishop) if additional coverage was found. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.