The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 chat 04:57, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pig Island (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Contested PROD but non-notable per WP:BK. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:08, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Marcus Qwertyus 23:28, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Best seller with numerous reviews. Colonel Warden (talk) 05:42, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep I added some of the many references. The novel is clearly notable. Please practice some WP:BEFORE #9. Silverseren^C 16:16, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notability established by numerous reliable sources. Lazy, weak WP:Not notable nomination. Vodello (talk) 16:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Easy keep: Leifting, wtf are you up to? Some of these prods and afds look like they may be legit, but others....--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 17:31, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Easy KeepSadads (talk) 20:42, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.