The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peg Luksik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable perennial candidate/activist. Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. All sourcing I could find after combing through multiple search engines was either run-of-the-mill campaign coverage, WP:PRIMARY sources, or secondary sources containing only brief mention of the subject. Found no (non-routine) significant coverage in WP:RS-compliant sourcing whatsoever. Sal2100 (talk) 20:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Conservatism, Women, and Pennsylvania. Sal2100 (talk) 20:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — Clearly fails WP:NPOL; never elected only trivial mentions. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 20:28, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Does not meet notability guidelines Proton Dental (talk) 05:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.