The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Though there's no consensus here, this is an unsourced BLP. No prejudice against recreating with sources. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pamela Cox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable children's author. Gigs (talk) 17:33, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• This author may not be notable in herself, but she has added to a very notable series of children's book, and her contribution is interesting and deserves to be detailed in Wikipedia. It is mentioned in the German Wikipedia article on Hanni und Nanni. Hanni und Nanni is the German translation of Enid Blyton's six St Clare's Books, extended now to 27 books in German, 2 of them translated from Pamela Cox's contributions, which were bona fide attempts to fill gaps in the original series. de:Hanni und Nanni —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.14.212.43 (talk) 23:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Her contribution can be documented in other articles even if we delete her article. Gigs (talk) 00:17, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • de:Hanni und Nanni interlanguage links to St. Clare's (series), notice, so that point is somewhat irrelevant to this article. Uncle G (talk) 01:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 07:41, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.