The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . ✗plicit 14:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pamaria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No evidence of notability. Nagol0929 (talk) 14:10, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and India. Nagol0929 (talk) 14:10, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bihar-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:03, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- Unreferenced stub that has been a single line of text for 13 years. I find no significant discussion in RS and no real chance of expanding this into an article. With its age, draftify is simply not a viable option. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 21:09, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.