The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Courcelles (talk) 21:24, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

North of England cricket team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article did not show that the team has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The only sources you provided were CricketArchive and Scores & Biographies, which are not considered reliable or independent for this purpose. You also did not provide any context or history of the team, or explain why it is notable or relevant. DarklarkOxs (talk) 21:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. DarklarkOxs (talk) 21:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep per WP:SK#2 as a bad faith revenge nomination. The deletion rationale also appears to have been written by ChatGPT. 192.76.8.94 (talk) 21:06, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy keep per 192.76.8.94 and above AfD discussion.

  WhichUserAmI 21:20, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket and England. Shellwood (talk) 21:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.