The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nimoy Sunset Pie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet the criteria for a website. Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:30, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:41, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• • Delete coverage is trivial. Plantdrew (talk) 18:05, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No notable references. RoCo^(talk) 18:37, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.