The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:31, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Amsterdam (Mad Men) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically just an episode recap w/ a couple perfunctory reviews attached. Nothing to indicate this was an especially notable episode. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 23:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 23:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Multiple reviews from reliable sources cited in article. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - it does not need to be *especially* notable, just notable. In this case, it has sufficient coverage that indicates that it is notable. matt91486 (talk) 22:13, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Every episode of any TV show w/ a following gets reviewed and rated. Is that really enough to satisfy WP:SIGCOV? Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 22:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • If the reviews satisfy the notability guidelines, then YES, it is enough. Many individual episodes of TV shows do not have articles on Wikipedia because they don't have reviews. And, there are many on here that have articles but do not have ANY reviews listed (or found in a search). Why not concentrate on them instead of articles that have reviews, and therefore already pass notability guidelines. Your opinion that 2 reviews isn't enough does not supersede guidelines and nominating these articles wastes the time of everyone involved in the discussions. Thx. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    You're the one who suggested I go through AfD when you rescinded my PROD. Otherwise, I'd probably have let it go. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 00:56, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - While I don't like that random episodes of shows can warrant a standalone article, it does meet Wikipedia's guidelines on what should be an article. It has significant coverage in reliable third-party sources that are independent of the subject, and it meets the episode specific guideline WP:NTVEP. - Aoidh (talk) 16:14, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.