Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Network Media Player
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to digital media receiver. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 01:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Network Media Player (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Upcoming product/software (not clear from the wording of the article). No assertion of pre-release notability, violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 15:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This looks like it is just a renaming of digital media receiver. I don't think that it is for any one company in specific, just digital receivers in general. It's already well covered at DMR as it is.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:32, 4 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- I don't see anything here that really needs to be merged, but a redirect from this title might not be a bad idea.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
Keep It's basically a Generic article. I guess it can help as a parent article. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The only problem is that this is all covered in digital media receiver. There's nothing here that isn't already covered and covered better in DMR. Keeping this would just be redundant.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:35, 5 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- * Comment In that case, simply redirect this there. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Digital Media Receiver as stated by User:TokyoGirl179. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:46, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]- redirect to digital media receiver. There isn't any content worth merging. -- Whpq (talk) 17:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect' to Digital Media Receiver, as stated by User:TokyoGirl179, and User:Whpq. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.