The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 01:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Volz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Case of WP:BLP1E. Coverage is solely related to the Abramoff scandal. Volz was non-notable before becoming a congressional staffer. As a staffer, no real coverage. As a lobbyist, his coverage is all in the context of how he was involved with Team Abramoff. His guilty plea and participation as a witness in other trials is all Abramoff related. I found an added some sources about what he's doing currently, but none of it is notable. Volz self-published a memoir about the scandal, but I don't see that getting past WP:AUTHOR. Niteshift36 (talk) 22:54, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - News found Jack-Abramoff-related links as well as Books, no significant or notable coverage apart from this. SwisterTwister talk 06:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.