The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 21:29, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Narayani Datt Chataut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP is not enough. Lack of reliable sources and there's no references of the article. so, It should be deleted. SeytX (talk) 08:51, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 08:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 08:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unlike most of the nominator's other current glut of misguided nominations, this article does not claim that its subject has served in the national parliament of Nepal — nor do any of the other articles about Nepal's parliaments link to him. Rather, this claims only that the subject was a local representative to the organizing committee of a political party, which is not a political office that passes WP:NPOL — and the only source for the claim is a book whose author has the same surname as the subject (thus probably a direct relative) and even the name of the publishing company also includes that same surname as well (thus raising the possibility that the book was self-published.) I'm willing to revisit this if somebody who can actually read Nepali can find a source to verify that he actually held a more notable political office than this article says he did, but nothing stated in this article right now guarantees him an article just for existing. Bearcat (talk) 18:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The sources are not enough to pass GNG and the position does not grant an automatic pass based on politician notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.