The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 22:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Muazam Ali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Limited coverage, non-notable cricketer, fails to pass WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:21, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:21, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:21, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep 4 FC and 9 LA matches for a county side. A simple search brought about a bit of coverage, but I imagine he would have been covered in Wisden and newspapers at the time to bring significant coverage. I've not been able to do a newspaper archive search though. List of Durham County Cricket Club players a suitable WP:ATD if required. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Per Rugbyfan22. StickyWicket (talk) 22:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.