The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 14:49, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Ibrahim Basuony (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does this guy pass WP:PROF? Unsourced since 2008. Zaminamina (talk) 18:05, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Google Scholar confirms his existence, but with an h-index of 2, fails to meet WP:PROF#C1. I see no other basis for claiming notability in the article, or after a brief google search. Ray^Talk 18:56, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, unsourced BLP. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 05:04, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per Ray. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:18, 28 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete. The citation record is very far from WP:PROF#C1 and there are no other indicators of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:56, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Ray and David. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 06:33, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:ACADEMIC. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 07:48, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 11:34, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted for clearer consensus? Where was there a single dissenting voice? -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 17:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete from apparent lack of notability.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 22:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.