Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mir Mandow Rind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Noting the comment by Shrikanthv, difficulty in rebuilding the article from scratch is not grounds for keeping, we have other avenues to take care of such concerns, such as undeleting and userfication. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:57, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mir Mandow Rind (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as sources are readily available, they are not adding anything to the article. The last one Badalkhan.pdf does not really back up the information in this article. Just two passing mentions of Mir Mandow Rind (written as Mir Mandaw). And a referral to a 30 year war among the tribes, causing not the Rind Tribe to loose power, but the complete Baloch people. With most of the info unsourced or unreliable sourced, this is not a worthy article for inclusion. (But I am aware that I can only read the latin alphabet, so it is well possible that there are sources out there that cover all info.) The Banner talk 18:03, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 02:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 13:06, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete As Banner notes, other sources may well exist that establish the subject to be notable, but as far as I have seen Mir Mandow Rind is mainly known as the father-in-law of Mir Chakar Rind (in fact, the only cited source that clearly mentions Mir Mandaw, notes that even his name is uncertain). Secondly, much of the article content is not really about Mir Mandow Rind himself, but rather about Mir Chakar Rind, the region, and the time-period, and it is not exactly clear what role exactly the subject played in described events. Lastly, the lack of in-line citations makes it impossible to verify the information that is in the current version of the article (and also duplicated in Mandwani!). So unless someone knowledgeable in the field comes along, makes the article compatible with our content policies, and clearly establishes notability, the article needs to be deleted. Abecedare (talk) 18:30, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep eventhough I had nominated it for deletion earlier, I think it has chance to be a better article. It may be very difficult to find realiable source for such a charecter. and may be the content depicts the style of mouth to mouth passed on grandma story , Deletion would be totally bring the the article to ground zero and would be difficult to interconnect to rebuild it again. so eventhough with very poor sources would suggest to keep it Shrikanthv (talk) 06:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.