The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mila Dolman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NARTIST. scope_creep^Talk 22:33, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:37, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:37, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I did not see any independent coverage whatsoever in a search.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:29, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:37, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:37, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - After searching Google, the only thing I found was social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn); there is no evidence of meeting BASIC, GNG or ARTIST criteria for notability. It is curious that there is much unsourced detail on this person'a life that is not reflected in the sources. The creator is a single purpose account that only edits this article, and a draft on this person's teacher at art school. Netherzone (talk) 15:15, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non notable Devokewater@ 11:04, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Found an article. https://www.mk.ru/culture/2020/06/04/russkaya-koroleva-londona-mila-dolman-ya-obitayu-v-gryaznoy-zone-.html

https://mira1.ru/en/feed/1129 are you searching her name as Мила Долман as well ? Patapsco913 (talk) 17:04, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• There is no evidence that she is a real artist, nor any evidence that any of her work is selling nor any evidence that her work is being held in museums. In fact there is barely mention of her at all. She is very very obscure and non-notable. scope_creep^Talk 17:33, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• If you could show Mila Dolman's work was in a museum, as a culturally important artefact, then that would clinch it. scope_creep^Talk 07:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Actually the criteria is that it needs to be held in the collections of "several" museums, which has been interpreted as two permanent collections in real museums. Being in a permanent collection is different than just being in a show. One article and one show at a museum does not make the cut. The criteria for a notable artist is here: WP:ARTIST and she does not meet it at this time. SIGCOV means sustained deep coverage over time, not one article. Netherzone (talk) 12:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep that in mind. scope_creep^Talk 16:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Could find anything that meets WP:GNG, WP:NPEOPLE or WP:ARTIST.   // Timothy :: talk  05:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per all of the above Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 13:08, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.