The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 10:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mia Malkova (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, and technical SNG passes are not sufficient to ignore that this is an inadequately sourced BLP. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Passes WP:PORNBIO. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 22:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:53, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:53, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:53, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a total failure of the general notablity guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:22, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:57, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:00, 18 February 2019 (UTC) [reply]

• Solid Keep. She meets WP:PORNBIO ("The person has won a well-known and significant industry award"). QED. Britishfinance (talk) 02:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. As other arguments - meets WP:PORNBIO which was created for situations such as this. Curved Space (talk) 18:46, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep - 2016 XBIZ Award Best Actress meets WP:PORNBIO.Guilherme Burn (talk) 19:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete meeting PORNBIO based on an industry award is not enough. She fails WP:ENT and sourcing is poor. Many biographical details about porn actors are faked so we need to be careful here. Legacypac (talk) 18:06, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: a BLP that lacks sources that discusss the subject directly and in detail; fails WP:BASIC. Sourcing is in passing, routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. --K.e.coffman (talk) 20:36, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Headline level coverage in major print and TV media - BBC News[1], Hindustan Times [2], India Today[3], International Business Times[4], Daily News and Analysis[5], Aaj Tak[6], Deccan Chronicle[7], Zee News[8], The Free Press Journal[9], NDTV[10], Dainik Bhaskar[11], Prabhat Khabar[12] etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.248.173.182 (talk) 21:17, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per her winning awards as well as the sources provided, Passes PORNBIO & GNG with flying colours. –Davey2010^Talk 22:52, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes PORNBIO, and good sources. 00:08, 28 February 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cindlevet (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.