The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per comments. This really did not need to be nominated. Missvain (talk) 07:13, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mia Kang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not obviously notable model Rathfelder (talk) 11:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 11:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep That’s not a deletion rationale. If you did a “Before” you would see very clearly that she has significant coverage from the Today Show, Fox News, The Independent, Vogue (!), South China Morning Post, New York Post, Women’s Health Magazine, WWD, ESPN, Page Six, Harper’s Bazaar, I mean... I don’t have to keep going. The only problem here is that the draft I created was moved in the air of the night before I was anywhere near done with it. I hate when people do that shit but hey, when I say something I get accused of ownership. Oh well, what do I know. ⌚️ (talk) 12:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Besides cited refs in the article which are WP:SIGCOV enough, there are lots of other significant coverage of her in reliable sources making her meet WP:BIO [1], [2], [3],[4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] (though this one relies a lot on citing what Kang has said). Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 19:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Jovanmilic97. XOR'easter (talk) 19:46, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.