The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:30, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Massar (Company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the exact same article with some items shuffled around that has been deleted now 3 times at the Massar Solutions page and is now salted. No indication of notability and essentially a WP:PROMO piece. -- Dane ^talk 01:28, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Dane ^talk 01:28, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment (Undecided) - If an article has a lot of promotional language, that is actually a reason for cleaning it up if the company in question is notable. This company has media coverage but I am undecided on whether it is robust enough to satisfy WP:NCOMPANY. (That crucial notability guideline was not mentioned in this nomination or in the previous speedy delete decisions.) If the article is kept at the end of this debate, the title should be moved to Massar Solutions because that is how it is named in industry sources and that is what it calls itself quite clearly ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 01:39, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I also took into account the notability and I believe this fails WP:NCORP. I apologize that I didn't mention the specific notability guideline I was referencing when I indicated no indication of notability. -- Dane ^talk 01:43, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Likely WP:PROMOTION. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 17:08, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Feels like a promotional piece, also does not appear to meet its notability guideline. dibbydib 23:47, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Respect your comments and views. The article was created through draft via Articles for submission after many sources were given and multiple changes incorporated to establish notability as per the views of the reviewer and administrator. The administrator and reviewer accepted the article after sufficient references and citations were given to establish notability.

Also Massar is not a private company, it is owned by the Government of UAE under subsidiary of Abu Dhabi Water & Electricity Authority and Abu Dhabi Power Corporation. The Abu Dhabi National Energy Company, PJSC (TAQA) (ADX: TAQA) a government-controlled energy holding company of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates is the owner now. (Francisjk2020 (talk) 11:58, 20 July 2020 (UTC))[reply]

• Comment: The AfC draft isn't largely different than the version that was G11'd. Also, the reviewer was not an administrator, just to clarify - it was a volunteer with the WP:AFC team who may not have been familiar with the prior article. The article still seems to fail WP:NCORP to me. -- Dane ^talk 15:15, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete again just not notable In ictu oculi (talk) 08:40, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.