Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlene Lawston
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ‑Scottywong| squeal _ 20:24, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Marlene Lawston (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A PROD template that gave a clear rationale for deletion was removed without an explanation. With only two movie roles and two TV guest roles, no major fan base as she has no official website, Facebook, or Twitter pages, and no evidence of her having made any significant contributions to the entertainment industry (she has not won any awards or recognitions for her acting), she bluntly fails every criteria for WP:NACTOR. The Legendary Ranger (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It doesn't appear that independent sources are writing in any detail about this actor, which means there are no verifiable facts upon which to build an article at this time. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:53, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Appears to fail GNG based on reliable sources (per FisherQueen and my own research). SarahStierch (talk) 23:32, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:25, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:25, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This individual does not appear to meet WP:BASIC for a Wikipedia article at this time. While they have a listing at IMDB, source searching has not yielded significant coverage in reliable sources. Sources found consist of passing mentions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The imdb roles don't particularly note anything that might suggest this person meets WP:NACTOR. No other reliable sources and expired PROD. Mkdwtalk 02:43, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.