The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio ^giuliano 22:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret J. Schneider (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:USCJN, we generally do not count magistrate judges as notable, nor do we count Assistant U.S. Attorneys as notable. I see nothing here that lifts this subject above the status of a run-of-the-mill magistrate judge. BD2412 T 21:34, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. BD2412 T 21:34, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:44, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:44, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Magistrate judges aren't presumed notable under WP:NJUDGE, and Schneider doesn't appear to meet the GNG: the Rockford Register Star article goes into very little depth (and is arguably more of a routine announcement), and my search found no other sources that'd contribute toward notability. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:59, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.