The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:49, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Manoj Kumar Yadav (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unelected politician, per WP:POLITICIAN TheWikiholic (talk) 10:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. TheWikiholic (talk) 10:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Subject has not held any office that would confer an automatic pass of WP:NPOL, and is not sourced even remotely close to well enough to claim that he would pass WP:GNG instead. Bearcat (talk) 13:00, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bihar-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 14:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not a notable political person Is there not a single news reference to prove that it is notable, fail WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lionfox0909 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Mccapra (talk) 20:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: As nominator said. Contributor008 (talk) 17:28, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unelected to any position, failing WP:NPOL. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:40, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.