The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mahzad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed. Insignificant name that fails WP:NNAME, WP:NOTDICT and WP:GNG. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 00:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: DICDEF. Not seeing notability; sure I find people with this name, but no reason to indicate this is notable. Oaktree b (talk) 01:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The problem is there's no extant Wikipedia articles about people with the name, but yes, I agree. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 03:28, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Iran. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:17, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: WP:NOTDICT, and there's nobody notable with the name. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 23:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.