Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lutel James

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 18:50, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lutel James (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:32, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, among many many more sources from newspapers.com, lancashiretelegraph.co.uk, lancs.live, theboltonnews.co.uk, etc. Having had an extensive fully pro and international career during the 1990s-2000s, there are definitely offline sources as well. Clearly is/was significant figure in English lower league as well as Saint Kitts and Nevis football. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 00:53, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I found 18 and 19 and 20, which states "James in his day was a leading and highly-sought striker for clubs such as Altrincham, Accrington Stanley and Guiseley. He also played in the Football League for Bury". We have found 20+ sources which isn't a small amount, and on top of that he has many many more sources from newspapers.com, lancashiretelegraph.co.uk, lancs.live, theboltonnews.co.uk, as well as other websites, etc. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 16:18, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Another brief mention, a copyright violating video and a couple of paragraphs. Dougal18 (talk) 10:41, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
James has eight mentions on the first source... Das osmnezz (talk) 17:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.