The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:21, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Luca Valenti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite I'm the creator of the page I start an AfD discussion. There was a concensus that says that one or two appearances aren't enough for a player to be notable if GNG is failed so comprehensively. Dr Salvus 17:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Dr Salvus 17:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Dr Salvus 17:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Dr Salvus 17:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've found three sources: ^[1][2][3] At this point is he notable? Dr Salvus 18:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:19, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep Delete: Updated my vote 7.29 based on discussion below. Based on my interpretation of WP:NFOOTY Players who have played, and managers who have managed, in a competitive game between two teams from fully professional leagues will generally be regarded as notable.. He played in games in the Serie C which is a professional league based on this list. It is weak because Trapani was excluded from Serie C for this year. FiddleheadLady (talk) 20:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FiddleheadLady, true but given that there is a concensus that says that with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively. When I created this page I wasn't aware of this fact. Dr Salvus 20:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. Can you point me to where the consensus is written so that I can learn more? FiddleheadLady (talk) 19:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@FiddleheadLady, I honestly don't know where is it. Courtesy ping @GiantSnowman: that may know where is this consensus written Dr Salvus 19:27, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@FiddleheadLady and Dr Salvus: plenty of AFDs ended up 'delete' even though the player met WP:NFOOTBALL listed here, but see also e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Sinclair (footballer born 1991) and many more. GiantSnowman 20:21, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's also referenced in WP:WINNEROUTCOMES - bullet point #4 Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:37, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! This is helpful. I have updated my vote FiddleheadLady (talk) 13:03, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Comprehensive failure of WP:GNG makes the presumption of notability from playing 4 minutes in Serie C invalid. Jogurney (talk) 14:12, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - the coverage is routine and not hugely significant and he only very trivially passes WP:NFOOTBALL. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:11, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Coverage in presented sources lacks more than trivial depth. Subject seems to lack even the bonafides sufficient to attain even the initial SNG presumption, let alone an ultimate GNG determination via in-depth coverage in RS. Article's author is, however, to be complimented in being a newish editor remaining open to the AfD process and contrary consensus. SnowRise ^{let's rap} 03:13, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.