The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:21, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Living Dead Man Window To Worlds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no references given, aside from amazon ebook status, which gives no indication of notability. a cursory search gives no further sources. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:41, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A search didn't show any notability for the book or its author. It's a self-pubbed (not that there's anything wrong with that) and non-notable read. A quick look at the adder's contributions show that this was their only contribution. I think this might qualify for a speedy delete since it seems to be pretty blatant advertising for the book. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:42, 19 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
  • I agree that its probably a speedy delete, but i like to give benefit of the doubt when possible.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:13, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no independent sources, no apparent notability. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:58, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.