The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Zoozaz1 talk 17:54, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Little Hawk (Crazy Horse's brother) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. Unable to locate any significant biographical details in secondary sources. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Even very quick search finds sources immediately, for example, [1]. My very best wishes (talk) 01:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG, also WP:NOTINHERITED applies.Mztourist (talk) 05:34, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep has SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG, also WP:NOTINHERITED does not apply because it states that "notability not being inherited is not by itself grounds for deletion". Andrew🐉(talk) 09:34, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where? Mztourist (talk) 08:52, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Click "Google Books" above, for starters. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 16:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merely passing mentions and more about his famous brother than him. Does not meet "If, for instance, there is enough information in reliable sources to include details about a person's birth, personal life, education and military career, then they most likely warrant a stand-alone article." Mztourist (talk) 03:06, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paragraphs are not passing mentions, though both are brought to you by the letter "P". DiamondRemley39 (talk) 18:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Passing mentions is all they are, no amount of sarcasm can change that. Mztourist (talk) 06:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep There are secondary sources posted in this discussion Spudlace (talk) 00:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I don't know what the nominator means by no significant biographical details in secondary sources. Details of his life and death are available in Google Books. I added some, but there seems to be a great deal more in these books, with references to earlier coverage too. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 16:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:HEY for DiamondRemley39's additions of reliable sources. It's easy to call everything a passing mention; far more productive to actually go and improve the article. — Toughpigs (talk) 04:15, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep argument is already made.Tsistunagiska (talk) 20:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.