The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:28, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Mumbai telecom companies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list has a set of telecom companies out of which all are not based in Mumbai. Moreover telecom companies operate in a circle rather than in a particular city/town. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Mumbai is a telecom circle, so that part of the nom would be inapplicable. However, I'm not sure what the value of having all these individual telecom lists is. You have less than 20 players nationwide (including the multiple names used by the same group) and it's simpler to just have one list cross-matching all the players with all these circles. Delete. —SpacemanSpiff 14:49, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.