Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Winning (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. However, this is only the second time the page has been created, so create-protection would usually be considered premature. If it is re-created again it would be appropriate. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 23:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lisa Winning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Newly recreated promotional bio of an Australian businesswoman; fails WP:GNG, WP:NBIO. I can't see the version deleted last year so don't know if it's sufficiently identical to warrant a speedy deletion, but the sources in this one do not support notability. They are WP:PRIMARYSOURCE interviews ([1], [2], [3], [4]), WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS of Winning that do not constitute WP:SIGCOV of her ([5], [6], [7], [8], [9]), or WP:USERGENERATED sources ([10], [11]). I checked to see whether her book He Texted would qualify her under WP:NCREATIVE, but the only reviews I found were on user-generated sites and thus there's no pass there. The one source that might fit the bill is in a vaguely promotional platform and written by a non-staff contributor who is not a journalist. Nothing found in WP:BEFORE search that works. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Australia. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete and WP:SALT. Like last time, purely promotional. Subject not notable, company not notable, and award not notable. 💥Casualty • Hop along. • 00:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete and salt as nom's analysis shows, sources are not reliable or sufficiently indepth to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 02:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Checked deleted version, not eligible for WP:CSD#G4. Also, not convinced salting is called for here.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete and WP:SALT. The nominator's analysis is accurate. This is a repeated creation so I support a SALT.4meter4 (talk) 21:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.