The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. charlotte ^👸♥ 19:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lily Phillips (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of an OnlyFans model whose claim to fame is having sex with 100 men. Coverage is all from within the past week or so and largely consists of deprecated sources and low-quality tabloids. Fails WP:N, WP:SUSTAINED, WP:BLP, WP:NOT, etc. Spicy (talk) 19:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and England. Spicy (talk) 19:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I would move it to draft space then and see if she gets more coverage.

  I only made this page since I read about her and saw that there was a German article about her but not an English one. Laura240406 (talk) 19:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  A draft already exists at Draft:Lily Phillips. Spicy (talk) 19:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  ah okay then I'm also for a deletion

  (btw the German Wikipedia's quality standards seem to be a lot worse than the English one's) Laura240406 (talk) 19:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: WP:BLP1E violation, utterly non-notable other than this event. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 19:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: see my comment Laura240406 (talk) 19:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify per WP:TOOSOON.--Launchballer 19:58, 3 January 2025 (UTC) Changed vote, see below.--Launchballer 14:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  There is already a draft that covers the main points and uses more reliable sources. Laura240406 (talk) 20:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All five of the sources currently used in the draft are in yellow and red at WP:UPSD. I removed the three it highlighted in the article.--Launchballer 20:28, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Internet. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The subject is only notable for one event and there is a lack of reliable sources even regarding the sole reason for notability. Svenska356 (talk) 01:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Article has been significantly improved by User:Launchballer and passes WP:BASIC and WP:SIGCOV. Tayce Widdrington (talk) 06:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Tayce Widdrington and WP:HEY.--Launchballer 09:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep following improvements, definitely meets WP:BASIC. – Meena • 14:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:HEY and above XxLuckyCxX (talk) 14:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:HEY Laura240406 (talk) 18:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.