The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect Lilingayon, Bukidnon to Valencia, Bukidnon‎. Due to procedural mistakes when originally nominating the other articles, they will not be redirected and should be renominated properly if the nominator wishes to consider them for deletion. Malinaccier (talk) 15:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lilingayon, Bukidnon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails WP:NPLACE as it lacks WP:SIGCOV only WP:TRIVIALMENTION. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:21, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:21, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Also Nominating: The following with the same reason as above:

Lurugan, Bukidnon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

San Carlos, Valencia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Tugaya, Bukidnon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• I also nominate the category where I get all this place, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 6#Category:Barangays of Valencia, Bukidnon
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:47, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Procedural note, the three other articles have not been tagged yet. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Valencia, Bukidnon per WP:ATD --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect all to Valencia, Bukidnon. They fail WP:NPLACE per nom. SBKSPP (talk)
• This bundled nomination was not done or formatted correctly. The articles were not tagged and I imagine the article creators were not notified. They won't be included in the closure. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Liz: done tagging them all them, sorry for the late reply as I'm attending my college class Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:16, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Miminity, you might have tagged the articles but this AFD is not formatted correctly, you just listed the articles in a way that is not suitable for a bundled nomination so XFDcloser will not recognize them as part of the nomination. Please review instructions for bundled nominations at WP:AFD for the next one you might try. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:41, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Liz: thanks just fixed it Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:24, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Looks much better, Miminity. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted to give enough time to consider all four articles which appear to only have been tagged on the seventh day of discussion, but up to this point the consensus appears to be to redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 14:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The deletion nominator created three separate AfD's (links: 1, 2, 3), all with the deletion rationale "same as [link to this debate]". Understandably, no one engaged with these debates in nearly 7 days, because this is a barrier for participation and not how things are done. I have closed those debates as a "procedural close", and removed the AfD templates from the article. Given the existence of those debates which the community did not engage with for nearly 7 days, I do not feel it is right to bundle the other articles into this nomination - my view is they should be considered separate, due to the presence of separate discussions. However, will leave this to the closer. The nominating editor is counselled to follow procedure correctly when doing bulk-nominations, and to carefully read said procedure if they are not familiar with it. Daniel (talk) 00:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.