Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Yu-yun
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 08:21, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Li Yu-yun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
She could very well become a notable tennis player but for now, she's 646th in the world in doubles and has only won junior titles in ITF Women's World Tennis Tour tournaments which are nowhere near as important as WTA tournaments. In any case, the most important thing is that she simply does not pass the the notability threshold. Pichpich (talk) 23:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Tennis, and Taiwan. Pichpich (talk) 23:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:44, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete or Draftify Definitely fails WP:NTENNIS and GNG not achieved. Timothytyy (talk) 07:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with User:Timothytyy Fails WP:NTENNIS
- PalauanReich (talk) 13:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete or Archive if possible. Justification: clearly fails WP:NTENNIS due to competing at 15k level, far lower the required 50k. She could become notable in the future. // MitYehor (talk) 15:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Draftify - currently falling short on WP:GNG and NTENNIS, may meet one of these in the not too distant future Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.