Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letter in the Sefer Torah campaign
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @230 · 04:30, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Letter in the Sefer Torah campaign (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:POV, WP:POVFORKING and WP:RS, as well as others. There are no references here other than primary sources. In addition, this can all be put under existing articles. Yossiea (talk) 15:38, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. -- Yossiea (talk) 15:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge to Mitzvah campaigns. There is no need to have WP become chabad.org. Yossiea (talk) 15:45, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable and FORK. Joe407 (talk) 16:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This belongs under the long list of mitzvah campaigns in Mitzvah campaigns, not in its own article with no sources other than the Rebbe's sichot. Yoninah (talk) 17:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom but nonethelss a truly respectful mitzvah campaign instituted by the Rebbe. --Shuki (talk) 21:30, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Redirect to Mitzvah Campaigns, where a couple of sentences or short paragrph can say it all. This is an outright WP:POVFORK and violation of WP:NOTADVERTISING for one group. P.S. this may also be alternately merged into the Sefer Torah article because it's only a variation on a theme of that. IZAK (talk) 12:24, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, or if that fails, Merge and Redirect. Jayjg (talk) 04:14, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.