The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There seems to be no agreement as to whether or not the amount of coverage in reliable sources is in-depth or not, and therefore no consensus as to whether or not GNG is met or not. No other indicaitons of notability were presented. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lara Johnson-Wheeler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe this meets WP:GNG. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 21:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:58, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:58, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. We already have articles in The Independent and Vogue, both considered "generally reliable" at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. NemesisAT (talk) 22:03, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  One article in each, and the headline of one introduces her as "Boris Johnson's daughter". Those articles don't make her notable enough to have her own Wikipedia article. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 22:31, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  We also have an article in The Sunday Times, another reliable source. I personally think the subject now meets WP:GNG. NemesisAT (talk) 22:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  The headline of that article begins "Boris Johnson's children", which I think is further proof that she doesn't have independent notability. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 20:20, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  I'll add that the Vogue piece was written by the subject, so it hardly qualifies as independent coverage. It's a primary source. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:13, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:46, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:46, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or merge: per my comments above, I don't think she is notable enough for her own article, but the information could be merged into Boris Johnson and Marina Wheeler's articles. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 20:20, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or merge to Boris Johnson. Coverage is sparse and rather indirect. May be notable later but seems WP:TOOSOON now. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:13, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete For now it is WP:TOOSOON. Fails WP:GNG. GermanKity (talk) 12:17, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: A review of news reporting shows she is notable in my view. She has put herself into the public eye with her modeling and is the current PM's daughter, in the UK this is going to make someone pass GNG. If she was a minor I would keep in a "family of" article.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 18:39, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, Multiple articles about her recently, including in the Independent.Jackattack1597 (talk) 11:12, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep There is enough in-depth coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 13:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.