The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to LGBT history in Poland. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT in Poland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to LGBT history in Poland per wp:2DABS following Israel case, unless categories count? See also these redirect and RM discussions. --MikutoH ^talk! 22:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender, Disambiguations, and Poland. --MikutoH ^talk! 22:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to LGBT rights in Poland. Sampling other countries for "LGBT in [country]", they always seem to redirect to the respective country's "LGBT rights in [country]" article. The See also section can/will take care of the history aspect, if the article body doesn't. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect. I prefer the redirect target of LGBT history in Poland, as it is closer to a Wikipedia:Broad-concept article and matches the Israel precedent. If sgeureka wants to provide the redirects they sampled, I am open to changing my mind, but it seems to me that the redirect targets are not consistent and depend on the what articles the country has. Either way, the target needs a redirect-for hatnote. I have added a link to the Rights article to the lead of the History one, and a For hatnote to the History article on the Rights one, so both choices are now okay as redirect targets. Toadspike [Talk] 08:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.