The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. On the assumption that JPL just put in one too many negatives, there is consensus that there is not enough sourcing to show notability Nosebagbear (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

L. Rahman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage found, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 14:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I'm surprised there were still initial-only cricketers on here given that they were mostly all looked at a while back. Bobo. 16:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete when we do not even know a person's full name, and have virtually no coverage, we should delete the article. There are people whose full name is not known who are not notable, but Rahman is not such a case.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Devokewater (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.