The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:39, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

L'Atelier aux Couleurs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no references, none found, content is entirely promotional, all that would be left is a single sentence stating it exists, and link to website. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The wording is promotional, arguably a CSD G11, indeed it is an extremely close paraphrase of the material on their website ("the" for "our" etc), so a WP:COPYVIO. Take that away and the article would be minimal and lacking in evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 07:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No notability, almost certainly promotional, and a very poor quality article. MatthewHaywood (talk) 18:19, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Appears to be spam. No independent sources found on a search; that's not surprising given that the facility is only ten years old. --MelanieN (talk) 19:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails significant coverage as required by WP:GNG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:24, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.