The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --MCB (talk) 04:33, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kruthik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable Dungeons & Dragons. Apparently appeared only in one supplement. Article contains original research and is mostly just in-universe information. No evidence of third party coverage. J Milburn (talk) 21:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. shadzar-talk 23:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable; mention in a list. Cheers, Jack Merridew 13:41, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.