The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 13:43, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kristine Elezaj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails WP:MUSICBIO and is not updated. IPadPerson (talk) 23:45, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I think the subject passes WP:GNG, with significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. The fact that nobody has bothered to update the article isn't a valid reason for deletion.

• Feature in Billboard
• Feature and interview in Glamour
• From the Huffington Post

...and there's more including passing coverage of others in the context of events where she performed (such mentions seemingly enough for people to understand the importance of said events). It's not the strongest case for notability and the article does need work but I think she just makes it over the line. St★lwart¹¹¹ 09:53, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Also found this article. -- Whpq (talk) 17:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.