The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Less Unless (talk) 20:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kion Lee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. HeinzMaster (talk) 22:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Caribbean. HeinzMaster (talk) 22:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep User has nominated ~25 articles for deletion in ~20 minutes. Imposisble that a WP:BEFORE was done for each, and the nominations appear to be in bad faith. NemesisAT (talk) 22:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:00, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - has clearly decided all players that play for national teams he does not feel confer notability are those which should be deleted. The usual revisionism and elitism around notability in sports Zanoni (talk) 08:15, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 15:11, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete none of the sources that are on this page meet GNG. Wikipedia is not meant to be a collection of sports stats tables masquerading as articles. Articles in Wikipedia are meant to be articles. I cannot speak to the nominator, but I did a search on google and found no substantive sources. It is very likely the nominator was investigating the whole group for some time and then put them all up for nomination. If people want, we can leave this open for longer for people to look for sources, but it is not justified to keep articles that have no sources on them. All articles must pass the current notability guidelines to be kept. Unless we can find GNG meeting sources, which none of the sources here are, than we cannot justify keeping the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:32, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - trivial mentions in match reports and squad lists but no actual substantial coverage so fails GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:23, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails GNG and I can't find any sources to that makes the player notable. Poppified ^talk 17:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.