Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Perdikou
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 22:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
- Kim Perdikou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Every reference except the last is a trivial mention, self-written, or PR DGG ( talk ) 19:49, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Comment This page, and the pages for Robyn Denholm and Steven Rice (Juniper) were all created by the same user (User:Tinucherian), who has also created a handful or more of other WP:BLP pages for people who are of don't meet notability standards. Tinucherian, if you are watching your pages, you may wish to review WP:NOTABILITY and WP:RS to save yourself the disappointment of having your articles deleted. LaMona (talk) 22:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. LaMona (talk) 22:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITYLakun.patra (talk) 06:30, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.