Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerous
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nakon 04:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Kerous (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. He has not received significant coverage in reliable sources to warrant a stand alone article. Furthermore, he has not received a single mention in reliable newspaper publications. All of the sources in the article are not reliable. Versace1608 (Talk) 02:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No useful sources were cited in the article. The Business Day publication still doesn't say a thing about the subject. Stanleytux (talk) 08:58, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete':- Obviously non-notable person. Fails WP:GNG. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 23:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.