Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karbala Ta Karbala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. The Bushranger One ping only 03:10, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Karbala Ta Karbala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. The poet in question is known for his work known as "Shehr-e-Hawas". this non notable work is not even his best work(according to sources). FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:23, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 19:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 19:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:58, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:16, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:09, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I am not inherently opposed to stand-alone articles for poetry works, but this one is a Marsiya. This entire sub-genre of poems is about lamenting the death of Husayn ibn Ali at the Battle of Karbala (680). Writing within a well-worn genre is not enough to guarantee notability. This article provides no evidence that this poem is different than all the others or has some special importance and coverage. Dimadick (talk) 10:44, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.